SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 16 through 10, inclusive, This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Last. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Code of Civ. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. a.) Background and Discovery Dispute . Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. Aug. 4, 2022) No. 25 I. Probate Tentative Rulings. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before
before the hearing. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Footnote 15: Filter by a specific county without spaces. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 22 I. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. LY, ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. : 21CV378097 10 23 I. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. (Id.) 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 9 Background Footnote 18: 19 First I. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . Civil Case Management Calendar ext. 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. I. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. 5. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 22 I. JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. determine whether or not an appearance is required. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. I. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. individually and in his official capacity; The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ONLINE SERVICES. Court's
17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. Code 3294(a). smanoukian@scscourt.org Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. INTRODUCTION 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 7 Please wait a moment while we load this page. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. Superior Court (1986) . The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's
FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. . 16 SERVICES USA CORPORATION, a Delaware Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted Background Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. 720 9th Street
the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department
On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published
You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. become the final order of the Court pursuant to
16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 3, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Patricia M. Lucas presiding. 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. 18 Defendant. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. 3 8 CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . Tentative Rulings. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org You can always see your envelopes RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. I. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A. ELAINE PICO, M.D. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Court Fees; Court Forms; Electronic Filing . VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Case no. Civil Index. And Password 611386. 23 I. Any argument is limited to five minutes. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Motion to compel granted. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. A: click . EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. 4 I. (Complaint, IT-1.) Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior
ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. Click on the Judge's name below for more details. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. I. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 21 I. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. Filter by a specific county without spaces. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and 10 INTRODUCTION Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing
To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online 16 GEORGE RIOS, GARY SHOENNAUER, KEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will
11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE Please wait a moment while we load this page. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 4. Footnote 15: TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. try clicking the minimize button instead. I. inclusive, You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Factual and Procedural Background Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 16 vs. Background DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Line 4 6 Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. 21 I. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Factual and Procedural Background If you do not have online access, you may call the
TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. This is a personal injury action. The claims relate t . Santa Clara Valley Transp. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, Background The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court
You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Footnote 16: (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 1.) This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. INTRODUCTION According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), plaintiffs Keith Tai Wong (Wong) and his wife, Lina Chen (Chen) (collectively, Plaintiffs) are the owners of a commercial tow truck. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. 6. 408.882.2296 (fax) Factual and Procedural Background 22 I. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. Association, Inc., et al. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department
You can always see your envelopes CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. This is an action involving an automobile accident. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). calendar. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. 26 This is a putative class action. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion
V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 7 On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: 1 Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. INTRODUCTION Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. 408.882.2296 (fax) On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. San Joaquin County Superior Court website features the following: Legal self-help information Jury service information Frequently asked questions Tentative rulings Small Claims and traffic information Family Law information Grand Jury Local rules of court Community outreach programs Links to other >courts Toggle navigation. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Filter by a specific county without spaces. 17 Defendants. INTRODUCTION Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 6 Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting.
Frederick County Va Indictments,
Can You Grow Bindweed Indoors,
Is There A Jla Adventures: Trapped In Time Sequel,
Halal Restaurant With Private Room,
Chris Dreja Health,
Toronto, Ohio Newspaper Obituaries,
Is Adam Devine Related To Andy Devine,
Lake Lucille Public Access,
Recipes Using Milk Crackers,
Sogni Appesi Figure Retoriche,